I saw this film over Thanksgiving weekend with my movie-loving aunt and uncle and I'm so glad I did as it seemed to get lost in the holiday shuffle this year.

Just before WWII, Lady Sarah Ashley (Nicole Kidman), an English aristocrat, inherits a ranch in Australia and flies there to prep the land for sale. Once there she becomes close with the hands on the ranch and discovers that the local businessman who wants to buy the ranch, Neil Fletcher (David Wenham), has been monopolizing the cattle industry and stealing cattle from her herd. She decides to keep the ranch open and stop Fletcher with the help of Drover (Hugh Jackman) who, naturally, droves cattle for a living. There’s really so much more to this film, which is so epic that it feels as though it should have been two shorter films. There are two distinct beginnings, middles, and ends, and the story lines include everything from droving cattle, to the bombing of Darwin, and even the “Stolen Generations” of half Aboriginal children. Even still, Hugh Jackman is always enjoyable and the child actor Brandon Wallace is captivating as the young boy Nullah that brings Lady Sarah and Drover together. However, instead of just paying homage to classic romance films such as Gone With the Wind, it all just feels a tad old fashioned.
Nominations:
Best Costume Design
The costumes in this film are quite stunning- in one pivotal scene Kidman wears a red kimono that pops against Jackman’s white suit as they share their first kiss in the pouring rain. However, I tend to think a film such as The Duchess could have this beat, as the Academy tends to favor the royal costumes of that particular time period.


Havaianas
I know some people knocked this movie, but I really want to see it. It seems like my kind of film.
1I enjoyed it. If anything, it's definitely entertaining. But it's also understandable that it's not up for any major awards.
2Sounds like the perfect rental, then!
It's been in my Netflix since it came out in
the theater.
3I didn't really enjoy this movie. I found the effects to be below par - you could several times that a green screen was being used. I know Baz Luhrman often has a cartoonish aspect in his movies but I didn't like it. Also it changed genre so many times! I thought the movie was about to end at one stage but then another chapter began.
4Gruig- my bf and I said the same thing! We were like, well the first movie could have been a great romance set in a western and then the second movie was like a romance set in a war movie. They really should have made it two separate films.
5The movie did have its flaws.. but I was surprised it didnt receive a nomination for cinematography.
6Mmmmm Hugh Jackman!
7I was actually surprised by how much I enjoyed this movie since I was expecting it to be horrible based on the reviews I saw. But I really liked it, especially the first part. Had that storyline been flushed out more fully into the whole movie, it would have been great. That said, I think this:
"The first movie could have been a great romance set in a western and then the second movie was like a romance set in a war movie."
sums it up perfectly. Plus, this movie was really pretty!
8Also, apologies to anyone who's posted on a number of Phase's reviews and is now getting inundated with my comments. I'm just getting caught up now that I've seen just about everything!
9I wasn't able to finish it but I think it's an okay movie. Might be because I am biased towards Mr. Jackman. ^^
10Post A Comment
To post comments, please log in or register.